
-Runa27
Moderators: kokoyaya, Beaumont
I think that you should rather use estar in both sentences. Estar is the best choice for locations (sentences like "Soy de Valencia" denote provenance, not location).Runa27 wrote:
So, it would be:
La biblioteca es en el edificio tres
but:
Estoy en la biblioteca, en el edificio tres.
Right?
Some more examples, showing the difference between the two verbs:Agimcomas wrote:
So, in summary, "ser" is for permanent things and "estar" is for temporary things.
pc2 wrote: if it was:
yo estoy español.
it would not make sense, because the speaker would be saying that he is Spanish at that moment, and it's not specifying that the speaker is always Spanish.
best regards,