LokaNova et Freelang

Si vous pouviez vérifier mon texte merci d'avance!!


To my mind guns still represented the law. So it’s normal that the only persons able to carry a weapon are the policemen. Then if everybody has one, I think that it could be the mess !! Each would adjust its accounts in his way.It’s not the goal !! Ineed, if each has a gun at home, their children can take it and creat an accident or kill someone. Futhermore for the alcoolics or depressive persons. Nowadays the policy as regards weapon evolves. Ineed given that weapons can kill, they equip the police either arms with bullets but electrical arms. These last paralyse the people who is touch with. But since then it is less dangerous?


(Biensûr) you will say me that to have a weapon at home is pratical to protect your family and your home from the intruders when the police isn’t hier. But if an intruder wants come back he will come back even you dissuade with your gun. I think that if it there are lots of problems in USA, it’s because people fool of his arm. It‘s not the weapon which is dangerous but people who have it.
I don’t mean that I’m agree with weapons as lon as it isn’t to kill a human...

Quelques corrections:

To my mind guns always represented the law. So it’s normal that the only persons allowed to carry a weapon are the policemen. Then if everybody has one, I think that it could be the mess !! Each would adjust its accounts in his way. It’s not the goal !! Indeed, if everyone has a gun at home, their children can take it and creat an accident or kill someone. Futhermore for the alcoholic or depressive persons (Cette phrase ne veut rien dire. Ou alors tu pensais a un truc du genre: It would be even more dangerous for alcoholic etc...). Nowadays the policy as regards to? weapon evolves. Ineed given that weapons can kill, they don't equip the police with arms with bullets but with electrical arms. These last paralyse the people who are touched with it. But since then it is less dangerous?


Of course you will say to me that to have a weapon at home is pratical to protect your family and your home from intruders when the police isn’t here. But if an intruder wants to come back he will come back even if you dissuaded him with your gun. I think that if there are lots of problems in USA, it’s because people fool of his arm (pas clair. Tu veux dire qu'ils adorent (sont fous) les armes?). It‘s not the weapon which is dangerous but people who have it.
I don’t mean that I agree with weapons as long as it isn’t to kill a human... (pas clair non plus. Y'a pas une negation en trop?)